Cain's
Naughty
Heart
Did
God
Judge
Cain
For
His
Sacrifice,
Or
For
The
Condition
Of
His
Heart?
By
Tom
Stephens
A
young
minister,
a guest
in our
church,
taught
about
the
story of
Cain and
Abel
(Genesis
4:1-8).
He
stated
Cain's
sacrifice
of "his
garden"
to the
Lord had
nothing
to do
with
God's
anger
toward
him
(Cain)
neither
had
anything
to do
with "a
blood
sacrifice".
To
prove
his
theory,
the
young
minister
used two
passages:
The
first
was:
"For it
is not
possible
that the
blood of
bulls
and
goats
should
take
away
sins"
(Heb
10:4).
In the
second,
he
attempted
to show
that the
Lord was
pleased
with
Cain's
fruit
offering
by going
to
Deuteronomy
26
concerning
"firstfruits".
He
believed
these
first-fruits
proved
Cain's
honor
before
God. So
why did
God
reject
Cain's
offering?
The
young
minister
believed
it had
only to
do with
Cain's
attitude.
Admittedly
Cain had
an
attitude
problem.
Genesis
4:4 says
Abel
brought
the
"firstling
of his
flock
and of
the fat
thereof"
indicating
a fine
healthy
lamb.
Cain, on
the
other
hand,
brought
"an
offering"
of the
fruit of
the
ground.
There is
no
indication
Cain
made any
effort
to pick
the very
best of
his
harvest.
But I
believe
the most
important
part had
to do
with the
sacrifice
itself.
In those
very
early
days of
man,
there
was no
instruction
for the
sacrificial
offering
so we
have to
look to
God's
example.
Adam and
Eve
tried to
cover
their
sin with
fig
leaves,
the
fruit of
the
ground.
God
Himself,
slew an
animal,
very
likely a
sheep,
and used
it's
skin to
cover
Adam and
Eve's
nakedness,
looking
forward
to the
day when
the
sinless
Lamb of
God
would be
slain to
cover
our sin.
Peter
said
Jesus,
the Lamb
of God
was
without
blemish
or spot
and His
blood
was
precious
(1 Pet.
1:19).
From the
beginning,
God saw
the
necessity
of
teaching
his
people
the
importance
of the
blood
sacrifice.
From
Eden to
the
Tabernacle
in the
wilderness
and all
the way
to the
crucifixion
of Jesus
Christ,
God
continued
to show
His
people a
"picture"
of
Christ's
giving
of
Himself
for the
sins of
the
world.
When
Adam and
Eve
sinned
in the
garden,
they
suddenly
realized
their
nakedness,
and God
showed
them
their
realization
was
because
they had
sinned
against
Him.
They had
been
disobedient.
Realizing
their
guilt,
they
sewed
fig
leaves
together
to cover
themselves;
but God
slew an
animal
and,
after
discarding
the fig
leaves,
used the
animal
hides to
cover
them (a
picture
of
animal
sacrifice).
God was
teaching
that
only
blood
could
take
care of
man's
sin
problems.
God
could do
nothing
to cover
or
forgive
sin
without
the
blood.
On one
occasion,
God
said,
"Not
Without
Blood'.
"But
into the
second
went the
high
priest
alone
once
every
year,
not
without
blood,
which he
offered
for
himself,
and for
the
errors
of the
people:
.. "
(Heb 9:7
- My
Italics).
Today it
is
through
the
blood of
Jesus
that
man can
be
saved.
It's
true
that the
blood of
animals
cannot
save,
but in
the Old
Testament,
it did
cover
sufficiently
for a
period
of time.
Then
this
rite was
to be
repeated
until
Jesus
would
give
Himself.
God
could do
nothing
in the
Old
Testament
without
blood,
just as
today He
can't.
It must
be by
the
blood of
the
precious
Lamb.
Compare
that
with
God's
act of
substituting
the fig
leaves
for
animal
skins
from the
creature
God
Himself
slew.
Likely
taught
by their
father,
Cain and
Abel
should
have
realized
that sin
sacrifices
must be
by the
blood of
animals
(a
picture
of
Jesus'
shed
blood at
the
Cross),
and not
by
vegetation.
Cain
must
surely
have
known
his
sacrifice
would
displease
God. And
when God
rejected
his
sacrifice,
rather
than
repent,
he
killed
his own
brother.
Cain had
a
rebellious
heart.
He
rejected
God's
law and
sinned
against
Him. He
wanted
to do it
his own
way,
thereby
gaining
in
himself
the
spirit
of
antichrist.
There's
Biblical
proof of
God's
dissatisfaction
with the
sacrifice
of Cain
because:
1)
His
sacrifice
did not
coincide
with
God's
plan for
eternity.
"By
faith
Abel
offered
unto God
a more
excellent
sacrifice
than
Cain, by
which he
obtained
witness
that he
was
righteous,
God
testifying
of his
gifts:
.. "
(Heb 11
:4)
2)
He hated
his
brother
because
God
honored
his
brother's
sacrifice.
"Not as
Cain,
who was
of that
wicked
one, and
slew his
brother.
And
wherefore
slew he
him?
Because
his own
works
were
evil,
and his
brother's
righteous"
(1
John
3:12)
3)
He
tested
the
spirit
of the
enemy,
and
greedily
lusted
after
the
pleasures
therein.
"Woe
unto
them!
for they
have
gone in
the way
of Cain,
and ran
greedily
after
the
error of
Balaam
for
reward,
and
perished.
.. "
(Jude
11).
Furthermore,
the
"firstfruits"
had
nothing
to do
with
Cain's
sacrifice.
The
firstfruits
was a
celebration
of God's
gracious
acts in
the
deliverance
of His
people
from
Egypt,
and a
tithe to
be given
to the
tribe of
the
Levites.
This
tithe
was
given to
minister
to the
Levite
tribe
and was
administered
only
after
the
twelve
tribes
of
lsrael
entered
into the
land of
milk and
honey
(Dent.
26: 1).
This
tithe
was
given
the
Levites
because
they
were not
allotted
any land
to farm,
and it
became
their
"substance".
Also,
the
tithe
was
given
for the
sake of
" ...
the
stranger,
the
fatherless,
and the
widow,
that
they may
eat
within
thy
gates,
and be
filled"
(Deuteronomy
26:12).
The
firstfruits
was a
part of
God's
blessing
to His
people
in
deliverance
from
Egypt,
the
miraculous
keeping
of His
people
during
the
forty
years,
and the
claim to
the land
of milk
and
honey.
They now
had a
nation
and God
promised
His
continued
blessings
if they
would
consistently
harken
unto His
Word.
The 26th
chapter
of
Deuteronomy
discusses
the
"firstfruits"
celebration.
Note -
If Cain
had
repented
before
God
instead
of
murdering
his
brother,
God
would
have
forgiven
him
concerning
his poor
quality
sacrifice.
Christians
today
also
have
attitude
problems.
Hopefully,
they
have
nothing
to do
with the
precious
blood of
Christ
in their
lives.
Sacrifices
were
used all
through
the Old
Testament
to honor
God; to
show the
Israelites
of old
the
perfect
picture
of a
coming
Peace-Jesus
Christ;
and a
prophetic
standard
which
links
the Old
Covenant
God made
with
Israel,
with the
New
Covenant
which
absolutely
saves to
the
uttermost!
11
But
Christ
being
come an
high
priest
of good
things
to come,
by a
greater
and more
perfect
tabernacle,
not made
with
hands,
that is
to say,
not of
this
building
12
Neither
by the
blood of
goats
and
calves,
but by
His own
blood He
entered
in once
into the
holy
place,
having
obtained
eternal
redemption
for
us"
(Hebrews
9:11-12-my
bold).
Blessings
from:
www.christsbondservants.org