Prince William to “Confirm” Covenant with Israel from the Past
Before the reader considers this piece “conspiratorial” and passes it over as such – I am simply providing historical facts. After reading about the history which could point to Prince William as a possible candidate for the coming Antichrist, it is certainly up to the curious of mind to connect the dots – or not.
Let’s look at what the Bible says about Antichrist
From raptureready.com (excerpts)
The Nationality of Antichrist by Britt Gillette
Is the Antichrist Jewish?
Is the Antichrist Jewish? Although there is no definitive answer, two Bible verses provide good reason to believe he will be. The first appears in the book of Genesis, where God prophesies the coming of Israel’s Messiah and Satan’s Antichrist.
“From now on, you and the woman will be enemies, and your offspring and her offspring will be enemies. He will crush your head, and you will strike his heel” (Genesis 3:15, NLT).
Later, when Jacob is blessing his sons, he makes this prophecy about Dan:
“Dan will govern his people like any other tribe in Israel. He will be a snake beside the road, a poisonous viper along the path that bites the horse’s heels so the rider is thrown off” (Genesis 49:16-17, NLT).
This reference to a serpent striking a heel may indicate that the Antichrist will be a Jew from the tribe of Dan; but it isn’t certain, and many reasonable people are divided on this issue.
In addition to this reference to the tribe of Dan, Daniel points out that the Antichrist will worship himself above all else:
“Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all” (Daniel 11:37, KJV).
This passage is often referenced by those who believe the Antichrist will be of Jewish heritage. The fact that he will have no regard “for the God of his fathers” is viewed as a reference to the monotheistic God of the Jews.
Adding further fuel to speculation that the Antichrist might be Jewish is the following passage from the book of Revelation:
“Then I saw another beast come up out of the earth. He had two horns like those of a lamb, and he spoke with the voice of a dragon” (Revelation 13:11, NLT).
This verse states that the Antichrist will “come up out of the earth,” a biblical phrase often associated with the Promised Land and the Jewish people. Throughout the Old Testament, the earth is used as a symbol for Israel, while the sea is used as a symbol for the Gentile peoples:
“And now in my vision I saw beast rising up out of the sea. It had seven heads and ten horns, with ten crowns on its horns. And written on each head were names that blasphemed God” (Revelation 13:1, NLT).
The verse above is a reference to the Antichrist’s kingdom, which, as stated before, will be a revived form of the Roman Empire, thus emerging from among the Gentile people. But all the authority of this kingdom will be exercised by “the beast from the earth” referenced in Revelation 13:11:
“He exercised all the authority of the first beast. And he required all the earth and those who belong to this world to worship the first beast, whose death-wound had been healed” (Revelation 13:12, NLT).
The first beast, whose “death-wound had been healed,” is the revived Roman Empire. Daniel clearly states that this world empire will reemerge in the last days, thus becoming healed of its mortal wound. But the one who rules it will “come up out of the earth.” Could this be a reference to the Antichrist’s Jewish heritage? –source
Was Princess Diana a Jew?
From Aish.com
***This article was primarily about Kate Middleton being of Jewish heritage, but see what this Jewish site says about Diana:
“The Jewish line thickens with her hubby Wills. It’s been speculated that Princess Diana’s mother, Frances Shand Kydd, was born Frances Ruth Burke Roche, a Rothschild. If that weren’t enough, the London Daily Mail reported that Diana is actually the biological daughter of Sir James Goldschmidt, also a Jew.” – source (emphasis added)
The Bible tells us that the Antichrist will be from the lineage of the people who destroyed the Temple:
Was Great Britain part of the Roman Empire?
From historylearningsite.co.uk
The Roman Empire included most of what would now be considered Western Europe. The empire was conquered by the Roman Army, and a Roman way of life was established in these conquered countries. The main countries conquered were England/Wales (then known as Britannia), Spain (Hispania), France (Gaul or Gallia), Greece (Achaea), the Middle East (Judea) and the North African coastal region. – source (emphasis mine)
The Antichrist “Confirms a Covenant”
Many people quote the Word of God as saying that Antichrist will “make” a covenant with Israel. Here is what the Bible actually says:
“Then he shall confirm a covenant with many for one week;
But in the middle of the week
He shall bring an end to sacrifice and offering.
And on the wing of abominations shall be one who makes desolate,
Even until the consummation, which is determined,
Is poured out on the desolate” (Daniel 9:27). (Emphasis added)
| Prince William’s visit will advance the Jordan-Israel solution
Jordan’s independence in 1946 and Israel’s in 1948 laid the groundwork for the 1937 Peel two-state solution rejected by the Arabs. A new version between the two existing states of Israel and Jordan is today’s viable solution. Kensington Palace’s carefully-crafted tweet announcing that “The Duke of Cambridge will visit Israel, Jordan and the Occupied Palestinian Territories in the Summer” – could spark a diplomatic war with far-reaching implications. The Palace clarified that: “The visit is at the request of Her Majesty’s Government and has been welcomed by the Israeli, Jordanian and Palestinian authorities.” This will be the first official Royal tour to the State of Israel since its establishment in 1948. Israel’s President Rivlin and Prime Minister Netanyahu have expressed their delight at this long-overdue announcement. Jordan – visited officially by Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip in 1984 – will enthusiastically welcome their grandson Prince William. The British Government’s decision to also dispatch the Prince to visit the “Occupied Palestinian Territories” (“OPT”) – Judea and Samaria (the West Bank), East Jerusalem and Gaza – the last remaining 5% of the territory of the Mandate for Palestine where sovereignty remains unresolved between Jews and Arabs – is very intriguing. The PLO and Hamas have been engaged in an internecine struggle for control in the OPT since 2007 – whilst the PLO has suspended negotiations with Israel over the allocation of sovereignty in the OPT since April 2014. Corruption and nepotism are rife and elections are long overdue. Murderers of Israelis are rewarded with financial payments for life. PLO chief Mahmoud Abbas’s incendiary comments at the United Nations on 20 February claiming the British Government bears responsibility for the catastrophic consequences inflicted on the Palestinian people as a result of Britain’s 1917 Balfour Declaration – create a toxic environment for the Royal visit. Indeed, Abbas had earlier declared in the United Nations General Assembly in September 2016: “We ask Great Britain, as we approach 100 years since this infamous declaration, to draw the necessary lessons and to bear its historic, legal, political, material and moral responsibility for the consequences of this declaration, including an apology to the Palestinian people for the catastrophes, misery and injustice this declaration created and to act to rectify these disasters and remedy its consequences, including by the recognition of the state of Palestine. This is the least Great Britain can do.” Another Abbas demand in March 2017 that Britain apologize for the Balfour Declaration was swiftly rejected by the British Government. Britain’s Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson – writing in the Daily Telegraph on 29 October 2017 – went even further: “I have no doubt that the only viable solution to the conflict resembles the one first set down on paper by another Briton, Lord Peel, in the report of the Royal Commission on Palestine in 1937, and that is the vision of two states for two peoples.” The Peel Commission recommended two sovereign independent States be established in Palestine: 1. An Arab State – consisting of Trans-Jordan (now called Jordan) – 77% of the territory of the Mandate for Palestine – united with part of the remaining 23% of the Mandate territory within which the reconstitution of the Jewish National Home was proposed in 1922. 2. A Jewish State consisting of the remainder of the 23% of Palestine. The Arabs rejected the Peel recommendations. However, Jordan’s subsequent independence in 1946 and Israel’s in 1948 laid the groundwork for the Peel two-state solution applying in 99% of former Palestine between 1950 and 1967 after Jordan and Egypt had illegally invaded and occupied the OPT in 1948. Great Britain in 1950 and the PLO on its establishment in 1964 recognized this two-state reality – which remains the key to resolving the 100-years-old Arab-Jewish conflict. Prince William’s visit to the Occupied Palestinian Territories ensures that resurrecting the Jordan-Israel two-state solution once again takes center stage. –source |
I have given the reader facts. Could Prince William be the coming man of sin whom the Word of God calls The Antichrist?
As I’ve said before – we are looking for Jesus Christ – not Antichrist. But I think that it is prudent for us, as we watch the Signs of the Times, to at least consider Prince William as a viable candidate for the coming Beast of Revelation.
MARANATHA!
Articles at grandmageri422.me