The day before her debate with Donald Trump, Kamala Harris released her policy statements at kamalaharris.com titled “A New Way Forward.” Her new way forward is much like the old way backward, cloaking extreme leftist ideas in words that give images of working middle-class ideals.

In essence, it’s a propaganda policy page where, in every instance, the extreme Democratic Party positions are made to sound like great American concepts that promote wealth, financial security, and social freedom. In reality, these extreme policies lead to socialistic bondage under a Marxist philosophy. In reading through her policy statement, she has made it sound like eutopia when the devil is truly in the details.

Harris has been in office with Joe Biden since the beginning. How is it that a day before her debate with Trump, she comes up with new forward-thinking policies to solve the problems that she and Biden created?

For example, she has a platform plank: “Secure our borders and fix our broken immigration system.” She was put in charge of fixing the border problem that she and Biden created by inviting illegal aliens to cross the borders. When it became an intolerable situation, she blamed it on Trump, did nothing to stop the influx of illegal entrants, and lied to the American people that the problem was solved. She says she believes in “tough, smart solutions to secure the border.” She also states she knows the immigration system is broken and needs comprehensive reform that includes strong border security. If only words were solutions…

Her ideas on banning private gun ownership are also couched in dog-whistle language to the extremists who will vote for her. She states she “won’t stop fighting so that Americans have the freedom to live safe from gun violence in our schools, communities, and places of worship.” Interesting, don’t we already “have the freedom to live safe from gun violence”? It’s not our freedom that is the issue; it is the criminal and mental state of those who commit gun violence.

Yet, Harris wants to continue banning guns, requiring government background checks, and establishing red flag laws to “keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people.” That would include former military and Christians because Democratic Party leaders believe patriots and Christians are dangerous. Plus, she wants to use the same controls that don’t work in the most controlled areas.

She uses the phrase “Americans should have the freedom to…” several times. In each case, she is enumerating freedoms that we already have. Then, she states how her government will take away freedoms of the regular citizen to curb gun violence, or drug problems, or border security. Instead of addressing the criminals, her policies are to expand government control over all citizens, hoping to catch in the wide net the bad guys too. This is nothing short of Marxism, and the propaganda paints a picture where government, not God, can solve all the problems.

The Communist Manifesto says, “But communism abolishes eternal truths, it abolishes all religion, and all morality, instead of constituting them on a new basis.”

God, in Exodus 20:3, says, “Thou shalt have no other gods before me.”

Sources:

https://kamalaharris.com/issues/

Posted in The Daily Jot

The debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump revealed four main takeaways:

1) Harris showed better than anyone expected.

2) Trump spent most of the night countering Harris lies about him.

3) The moderators “fact-checked” Trump and helped Harris by not pressing her on her lack of substance and lies.

4) The candidates clearly have two distinct and opposite visions of America. One has a vision of government subsidies (tax money) solving all the problems that government policy has created. The other’s vision is of a nation in great decline because of failed government policies that must be corrected. Overall, Americans lost out because the moderators made the debate a sham.

The expectations were so low for Kamala Harris that all she had to really do was show up and not cackle after every statement, and she would be hailed by the pundits as the winner of the debate. That she accomplished. The media is fawning over her in the aftermath. She came across as well-rehearsed, stayed on point, and was articulate, but lied and twisted the truth about herself and her opponent throughout the debate. She dodged questions on her record, conjured up false narratives, and mocked Trump through both her words and facial expressions. She claimed that Trump was the candidate of division and she was the candidate of vision. Hers was a tremendous showing of projection—accusing others of exactly what she was doing.

Trump, on the other hand, spoke directly about the negative impact the Biden-Harris Administration has had on America. His driving theme was that America is in trouble and Harris and her Marxist policies were to blame. He often spoke in hyperbole, which sparked correction from the moderators. The issues, however, that Trump raised—immigration, crime, inflation, cost of energy, food, and housing are among those that Americans are dealing with every day. Trump’s anger at what the Biden-Harris Administration has done to this country was clearly evident. He exposed several times the weaponization of government by Biden-Harris against him and citizens, the incompetence of Harris, and the danger ahead because of her weaknesses.

The moderators were clearly biased. They fact-checked Trump no less than seven times and allowed Harris to lie at will. They let Harris off the hook on debunked hoaxes about Trump’s statements on race, very fine people, bloodbath, disparaging the military, etc. They allowed the debate to focus on the scandals conjured up by the Democratic Party against Trump rather than holding Harris accountable for her waffling and lying about abortion, the military, Israel, and a multitude of false narratives about Trump.

Harris was clearly aided by the moderators. Who won? The Marxists. Who lost? The American voters. Once again the media could not be trusted to impartiality. They skewed the debate in favor of Harris.

Proverbs 11:1 says, “A false balance is abomination to the Lord.”

It should be detestable to the rest of us, too.

Posted in The Daily Jot