Archaeology comes through again!

One of many iconic accounts from the Bible, going back to the very edges of antiquity, the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah is a cautionary tale.

But it is something else, too: a real event in time. I’m always fascinated by skeptics that claim the Bible is myth, or full of contradictions.

It’s neither, but at least in the realm of myth, archaeology helps us answer these unfounded charges. It then becomes a faith-strengthening opportunity.

Now, the region where this biblical disaster happened is a very unforgiving place. Almost a moonscape, near the Dead Sea, and straddling the modern states of Jordan and Israel. (I’ve been to Masada several times, but only once in the summer! The heat can reach dangerous levels.)

Here is an exciting account of research there, per the Jerusalem Post:

Biblical sin city Sodom destroyed by asteroid stronger than nuke – expert

Excavations in Jordan offer compelling evidence for the authenticity of the biblical tale of the destruction of Sodom, but by an asteroid impact, says theologian Dr. John Bergsma.

A theologian is pointing to excavations in Jordan, uncovering what the Post refers to as one of the Bible’s “most improbable narratives.” Hint: Media doesn’t believe it.

“Bergsma asserts that archaeological findings in Jordan corroborate the existence of the biblical city of Sodom. Prior research had already indicated that the ancient city of Tell el-Hammam, located in the southern Jordan Valley, suffered a catastrophic fate—a revelation that Dr. John Bergsma, a theology professor at Ohio’s Franciscan University, believes aligns with the biblical account.

“As per the Book of Genesis, God unleashed brimstone and fire upon the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah in response to the sins of their inhabitants, resulting in their complete obliteration. Similar destruction patterns were uncovered at Tell el-Hammam, leading Bergsma to reevaluate the credibility of the biblical narrative. He pointed to signs of extreme heat detected on skeletons and pottery fragments unearthed by archaeologists, suggesting a possible impact from an asteroid.”

If it is Sodom, we must keep in mind that even if someone acknowledges a biblical account is true, there is a tendency to find more naturalistic causes for the destruction that in reality came straight from God. As we read in Genesis 19:28—

“And he looked over the face of Sodom and Gomorrah and over the entire face of the land of the plain, and he saw, and behold, the smoke of the earth had risen like the smoke of a furnace.”

By the way, it’s interesting that even secular scholars and archaeologists usually date ancient Near East cities and other sites at around 4000 B.C. for the earliest inhabitants. This of course corresponds to biblical chronologies, and not to the purely evolutionary dates that emerge from the mists of time, often stretching back hundreds of thousands of years. These great ages are assigned because evolution demands it, with the progression of hominids into modern humans. So when it’s acknowledged that an ancient city state began less than 5,000 years ago…that in itself is confirmation of the biblical timelines.

Located not far from Jericho (considered today to the be oldest continuously inhabited city in the world), Tell el-Hammam puzzles researchers because it ceased to exist suddenly. No siege works are present in excavations, so the fact that the city was destroyed very quickly lends credence to the biblical account of the cosmic/divine destruction.

“Bergsma received insight into some remarkable discoveries from Steven Collins, the chief archaeologist at Tell el-Hammam. Among these discoveries were pottery shards coated with trinitite, a glassy substance formed when an atomic bomb detonates in a desert, as Bergsma explained. Additionally, human remains were uncovered, with skeletons intact up to the mid-spine, above which only scorch marks remained. These findings provide substantial evidence that a tremendous burst of heat from the sky incinerated the twin cities on the Jordanian side of the river.”

I’m not particularly interested in the asteroid hypothesis, because it tends to minimize the direct hand of the Lord, but if that is the method He used, fine. The point here is, there is “concrete” evidence for the destruction of the cities of the plain, as described in Genesis.

Besides the prophecies being fulfilled at an astonishing rate, this is also another Golden Age of archaeology in the region, as a new discovery routinely affirms Scripture.

Jimfletcher761@gmail.com

www.patreon.com/TheGodThatAnswers

 

 

 

Is a Palestinian state coming?

It’s hard to believe that a two-bit thug like Mahmoud Abbas could make demands of Israel, but he’s gotten away with it since his boss, the demonic Yasser Arafat, completed the only humane act of his miserable life by leaving it in 2004.

Abbas, an old-school terrorist from the PLO, has now “served” as president of the Palestinian Authority for now, oh, 17 years without an election.

Abbas is somewhat on the sidelines as the Israelis, Americans, and Saudis negotiate a possible long-range security deal with the oil-rich desert kingdom. Among the issues being discussed is a security arrangement, first between the U.S. and the Saudis, and secondly, a similar deal with Israel. What the two Middle East countries get between themselves is a cultural and business openness not previously possible. This is perhaps the centerpiece of the deal originally negotiated with other Arab states by Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu.

Naturally, the regime in Washington intends to take credit for it, as the Jerusalem Post puts it:

“’If the Biden administration succeeded [in making what] I believe is the biggest historical deal since the end of the Cold War, then we are going to start a relationship [with Israeli] and that is a relationship that will continue regardless of who is running Israel,’ bin Salman said.”

Typical of the corrupt Biden, who has refused to invite Netanyahu to the White House and only spoke to him this week in New York. Biden has always touted his “good friend, Bibi” routine, but of course he throws the Jewish state under the bus if it suits him, although I’m not sure he despises Israel as much as Obama does.

But I digress.

There are some interesting “read-between-the-lines” nuggets in the Post article. One involves possible motives for the parties trying to fast-track the deal (an Israeli official thinks a deal might be signed in 2024).

China is a threat to literally everyone and the Western principals in the Saudi deal fear growing Chinese influence in the Middle East. So they are willing to consider a nuclear Saudi Arabia, which, in my opinion, is a colossal blunder. It is my personal feeling that none of the Arab states can be trusted regarding Israel’s security. I also wouldn’t make the deal because of the Saudi demand that a Palestinian state be established.

Listen to this perspective from Saudi leaders:

“The Crown Prince himself warned in his Fox News interview that should Iran develop nuclear weapons, Saudi Arabia would do so as well.

“’We are concerned with any country getting nuclear weapons,’ bin Salman said, but he stated if Iran ‘gets one, we have to get one.’”

It seems to me that knocking-out Iran’s nuclear program would make the need for any other state to have one a moot point. I still hold out hope Netanyahu is serious about doing that.

But it is the issue of a Palestinian state that just won’t die. I noticed this week in the Washington Institute that Dennis Ross is still peddling the same soggy mess—the two-state solution—that has been promoted by all Western diplomats for the last 30 years. Most have been bad characters, although I would concede some of them might be dupes or simply soft in the head. There are classic liberals that aren’t exactly radicals, but they sincerely believe the concepts and philosophies they learn at Harvard and Yale.

In other words, ideologies that don’t work in the real world.

No amount of diplomacy and dinner parties will ever make Palestinian leaders anything other than the killers they’ve always been. To negotiate with them is folly.

At a foundational level, this is the difference in philosophy between the Martin Indyks and Yossi Beilins of the world and Ze’ev Jabotinsky and a young Ariel Sharon. Diplomacy with your enemies vs. bullets.

Prophetically, as much as I detest the idea that Israel would show weakness by negotiating with people that wish to see them dead, there must be a scenario in the future in which the Jewish state is truly vulnerable.

It is then their God will intervene, and for all time.

Until that moment arrives, we must continue to pray for Israel daily, with specific petitions for specific issues.

Like her negotiations with enemies.

Jimfletcher761@gmail.com

www.patreon.com/TheGodThatAnswers